What's been happening in the licensing community in England and Wales this month?
Alcohol & entertainment licensing news
Other Licensing news
Hot on the heels of Cheltenham announcing disappointing revenue figures for the late night levy, Nottingham City Council has disclosed that it raised over a third less revenue (34%) than had been predicted in its consultation literature. Although it is not proposing to review the levy because of this, the figures follow a pattern that many operators predicted in their objections to the levy. These include:
Various authorities, particularly in London, are considering implementing the levy. They would follow in the footsteps of Islington, City of London and Camden, whilst Tower Hamlets has just consulted. News therefore that the predictions of authorities actually implementing the levy have been, in certain cases, wildly optimistic adds to the growing weight of evidence that the late night levy is an unworkable tax that fails to involve all parties who contribute to the night-time economy. Should more authorities consult, then it is for the industry to voice these concerns and engage in the consultation process.
Alcohol licensed premises:
Friday and Saturday 10 and 11 June are likely to benefit from universal 1am extensions to sell alcohol. It is unlikely that the extension will permit live or recorded music. If you want to provide music and your licence doesn't currently permit it, then you should apply in good time for a TEN. If the extensions end up permitting regulated entertainment, then you can always withdraw the TEN.
Like the Jubilee, there are likely to be street parties up and down the country. Here is a quick guide for those people looking to put on a party:
A significant number of premises licences now have conditions on them requiring records to be kept in various circumstances. These can include:
A lot of the time, these conditions will specify that the records must be made available to officers from the council or police. If you have such conditions, it is a criminal offence to fail to comply. However, what about those premises who do not have such conditions. Are there any benefits to doing so?
The answer, leaving aside the time it takes to complete such records, is yes. Even if you have instigated a raft of registers and policies and have never had to make an entry, it is still worth the effort. If the worst happens, such as a failed test purchase operation, the fact that you have kept records will assist in formulating a defence to any charge, or indeed expose a weakness that perhaps staff have taken their eye off the ball because nothing is being recorded.
On the other hand, it is more likely that once in a while, a complaint will be received or an incident will occur. In those circumstances, dealing with matters effectively has to be the main priority, but a little bit of time spent making a note of what happened, and more importantly what action was taken, is the makings of a due diligence defence should the complaint or incident require investigation by the authorities.
As is always the case, the usefulness of the record is made or broken by the information it contains. All records should be comprehensive enough to give a picture of what happened; time, place, names and details, along with the all-important actions taken, allow you to refute any suggestions that perhaps the matter was not dealt with properly. If it comes to an argument about what actually happened, a detailed note taken at the time is great evidence to be able to point to.
A new business plan sets out how consumers will be at the heart of the Gambling Commission’s work over the coming year. The plan covers the period from April 2016 to March 2017. Themes providing direction to the Commission’s work include:
A full copy of the business plan can be found here.
The Home Office and HM Treasury have published their action plan for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist finance. The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation has a free alerts service which notifies subscribers of changes to financial sanctions listings to help with compliance.
A copy of the full action plan document can be found here.
Last month took us to hearings for various matters in Essex, Oxford and London and client meetings in Wales, Reading, Leeds, Birmingham, Manchester and Burton on Trent. Of particular interest was a summary review application where the police tried to suggest that details couldn't be given of crime and disorder allegations because of ongoing investigations and the public nature of the hearing. We pointed out the matter could be heard excluding the public - something that was then able to happen at the final hearing. We also attended the ALMR spring conference where we joined with others across the sector sharing insights on the industry.