Last week the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal challenging Leeds City Council’s grant of planning permission for a development in an ‘edge of centre’ development. The Court of Appeal had to consider the correct interpretation of paragraph 90 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
Paragraph 90 is aimed at protecting the existing retail facilities in existing town centres. It requires that planning authorities refuse planning permission for applications for retail units that are on edge of town or out of town if they either fail to satisfy a sequential test or if the application is likely to have significant adverse impact on existing, committed or planned investment in the town centre, or on the town centre’s vitality and viability.
The application was for a Lidl and B&M Homestore some 70m outside the identified town centre.
Despite a recommendation of refusal from the Council’s planning professionals (based on the application being contrary to the Council’s centre first policy), the Council’s planning committee approved the planning application.
The issues the members highlighted included the opportunity for employment, economic impact, the site’s location on the edge of the centre (and the excellent links allowing trips between the existing centre and the proposed development site), and the opportunity to extend the centre.
Asda challenged the decision, arguing that in granting permission the Council had misinterpreted paragraph 90 by failing to recognise that it contains a “presumption” against development that would have a “significant adverse effect” on the “vitality and viability” of a town centre.
Setting out its approach to the interpretation of the NPPF the Court noted that the NPPF “is not the work of those who draft statutes or contracts, and does not always attain perfection”. The language of planning policy is usually less precise, and interpretation relies less on linguistic rigour. The Court will ‘seek to draw from the words used the true, practical meaning and effect of the policy in its context, bearing in mind that the purpose of planning policy is to achieve “reasonably predictable decision-making, consistent with the aims of the policy-maker”, it will look for an interpretation that is “straightforward, without undue or elaborate exposition”’.
The Court of Appeal held that paragraph 90 did not provide for a mandatory refusal, stating that ‘The words “should be refused” have a clear meaning, which requires no elaboration by the court. They do not mean “must be refused”. The policy is not imperative. It does not dictate a refusal of planning permission whenever the development proposed is likely to have a “significant adverse impact” on the “vitality or viability” of a town centre.’ It went on to say that ‘implicit in policy of this kind…is the need for planning judgment to be exercised in its application.’
In this case, it was clear that those who made the decision to grant planning permission made that decision conscious of the terms of paragraph 90. The policy thus played a part in the decision-making process.
In this case, Asda was unable to prevent a competing development from proceeding because the local planning authority had exercised planning judgment lawfully.
Owners of existing town centre retail units are unlikely to take comfort from this decision as it confirms a more flexible approach to town centre first planning policies can be acceptable. Whereas retail developers looking for new opportunities outside the defined town centre will be more encouraged by the decision.
Local planning authorities need to ensure that they are aware of their obligations in relation to the protection of town centres as described in paragraph 90, and that they keep accurate and full minutes of meetings recording their decisions.Contributor: Alexandra Holsgrove Jones
HR Horizon tracker Spring 2021Read more
TLT forms new partnership to support employee ownership growthRead more
Flexible working beyond the pandemicRead more
TLT expands role on national legal services framework for policeRead more
Automatically unfair dismissal and Covid safety concernsRead more
Failure to enhance Adoption Leave Pay not discriminatoryRead more
Employment Law Focus: TechnologyRead more
TLT appointed to Vodafone's global legal panelRead more
TLT appointed to sports and arts legal services panelRead more
Watch our video series for information on the legal issues that are affecting the real estate sector. Each...Read more
Helping you navigate your business through the risks and opportunities that Brexit will bring.Read more
The way people shop is constantly evolving, from the growth of online and the changing use of stores...Read more
The widespread disruption and closure of businesses caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent national and local lockdowns has brought into sharp focus the question of available insurance cover for losses under...Read more
The pandemic has had a deep and long-lasting effect on the leisure, food & drink sector, forcing operators to embrace new ways of attracting and servicing customers.Read more
The pandemic has forced the majority of the workforce into a world of remote working. As a result, our cities are evolving.Read more
There's a growing demand for retailers to do more to attract the Purple Pound – the collective spending power of disabled shoppers, estimated to be worth around £274bn. We look at the opportunities, the legal issues and...Read more
Green finance is gaining speed, driven by global climate change pressures and the recognition of the vital role which sustainability plays in a resilient financial services sector.Read more
Keep on top of the employment law issues that matter most to you and your business with our new podcast.Read more
Providing a complete planning service with cross sector experience.Read more
We help developers manage the increasing public interest in the availability of land for public recreation, and the impact this can have on new development projects.Read more
We act for all the parties to the compulsory acquisition process, and we have particular experience in compensation claims relating to businesses and business relocations.Read more
We advise property owners and occupiers on how best to deal with an enforcement of the planning system.Read more
We act for any person or business that might have an environmental issue, whether that's a developer buying a site that might be contaminated or a leisure company with noise issues.Read more
We help developers manage the impact of their development on highways and public rights of way.Read more
We are particularly experienced in complicated, multi-party agreements for large scale developments, and understand the relationship between planning obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy.Read more