A round-up of recent enforcement actions and investigations in the financial services sector as well as a look ahead to the autumns’ expected activity.
Quick links for this month:
In what has been a quiet month for regulators and prosecuting agencies for headline actions, we have set out some thoughts on where we foresee FCA Enforcement actions arising during the coming months. This by no means covers all potential investigations and we would be more than happy to discuss with you areas in which firms such as yours may be at risk of greater regulatory scrutiny.
The FCA and other regulators have seen unexpected calls on their time and resources over the last 6 months. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic they have had to divert resources to tackle a number of pressing concerns, many of which were not contained in their 2020/2021 Business Plan. Significant time and energy has been put into seeking legal clarity on business interruption insurance coverage and providing guidance on forbearance expectations for customers in temporary financial difficulty as a result of the global pandemic, among other things.
We still await the publication of the Enforcement annual performance report for 2019/2020 which is usually published in July. This document accompanies the FCA’s Business Plan and provides useful insight into the activities of the FCA’s Enforcement teams, including the number and types of cases in the Enforcement pipeline. With the average regulatory and civil case, resolved by agreement, taking an average of 29.1 months from start to finish (in 2018/2019) the market can take some useful insights from the types of cases in the Enforcement portfolio.
For example, of the 650 civil and regulatory cases open as at 31 March 2019, the 4 areas of focus and consequently the largest number of cases involved (excluding unauthorised business):
It will be interesting to see whether the published outcomes in 2020/2021 reflect this split.
In the medium term we may see Enforcement focus on those areas of risk heightened by the pandemic such as employees working remotely. Whilst firms are grappling with the changing landscape of operating in the pandemic, the FCA has made it clear that they will not compromise on what they expect from firms.
This increased conduct risk in a remote working environment will need to be managed carefully. It is likely that there will be an increase in individual behaviour issues, challenges in maintaining a firm’s culture and disseminating/embedding that culture to new employees as well as challenges in managing people in this environment. This is in addition to the policy and procedure challenges emanating from the pandemic situation.
On 29 July 2020, the FCA published guidance for firms on treating vulnerable customers fairly. The guidance sets out feedback to the FCA’s initial view of what the Principles for Businesses require of firms to treat vulnerable consumers fairly.
In our recent article, Angela Hayes and Noline Matemera consider how firms can implement the guidance in practice, and any areas of concern of which firms should be mindful.
On 17 July 2020, the SFO received approval to enter its eighth deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd (G4S), bringing the SFO’s investigation to a close.
The SFO’s investigation related to alleged fraudulent practices by G4S under its contracts with the Ministry of Justice. In particular, G4S are alleged to have intentionally misled the Ministry of Justice as to the actual value of its profits under the agreements in an attempt to avoid contractual obligations to share the value of costs reductions.
The DPA will remain in force for three years from 17 July 2020, with the main terms of the DPA including:
The director of the SFO, Lisa Osofsky stated that the DPA ensured ‘G4S is held accountable for its methodical fraud against the Ministry of Justice’ and that G4S will be subjected to unprecedented, multi-year scrutiny and assurance.’
On 7 August 2020, the High Court ordered that Avacade Limited and Alexandra Associates (UK) Limited (the Companies) and three directors of the Companies pay £10.7 million in restitution to consumers who were induced to transfer their pensions into SIPPs.
The Court had previously found on 30 June 2020 that the Companies’ activities were unlawful on the basis that they had engaged in the following regulated activities without authorisation:
A further hearing took place on 31 July 2020 to determine the amounts the Companies and its directors should pay in restitution for their roles in the unlawful activity.
The Companies and its directors have been banned from engaging in regulated activities without authorisation, making financial promotions and making false or misleading statements about regulated investments.
HM Treasury has published its eighth annual Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) Supervision Report for 2018 to 2019 (the Report).
The Report contains several significant insights, including:
According to the Report’s introduction, effective supervision means focussing supervisory and law enforcement resources on ‘the highest risk but does not place unnecessary burdens on business.’
The Report recommends that the FCA and HMRC should determine the appropriate intensity of supervision according to their assessment of risk presented by those under their supervision and that the FCA should consider the wider use of criminal background checks to ensure that financial institutions are not owned or controlled by criminals and their associates.
The Complaints Commissioner, the FCA’s watchdog, has defended the regulator following claims that senior FCA staff treated a whistle-blower unethically through the use of ‘heavy handed tactics.’
The whistle-blower claimed that the health and medical teams working on behalf of the FCA had been aggressive and forced the whistle-blower to reveal ‘highly personal information’, focussing on them rather than the ‘persons committing the crimes.’
However, the Complaints Commissioner found that the FCA had not been involved in heavy handed or pressure tactics and did not have a flawed policy for dealing with such cases.
This is of particular interest considering the number of cases brought forward by whistle-blowers may increase given the FCA’s focus on individual responsibility and in firm’s embedding effective ‘speak up’ policies.terms & conditions.
How will the office of the future work?Read more
Flexible working: the impact on our towns and cities webinarRead more
How will the office of the future work? WebinarRead more
European Commission adopts revamped SCCsRead more
Evolving citiesRead more
Dismissal and re-engagement: refusing Covid changesRead more
Dismissal for health and safety 'friction' automatically unfairRead more
Council wins appeal on sale of former school site landowner's heirs...Read more
TLT forms new partnership to support employee ownership growthRead more
Councils - don't lose the right to charge CILRead more
Employment Law Focus: TechnologyRead more
Personal data transfers to US-hosted CRM tools could be unlawful Post...Read more
The pandemic has forced the majority of the workforce into a world of remote working. As a result, our cities are evolving.Read more
Issues that will impact the sector over the coming months - from future proofing social housing developments to managing offices post pandemic, green finance, and creating connected communities.Read more
Watch our video series for information on the legal issues that are affecting the real estate sector. Each...Read more
Helping you navigate your business through the risks and opportunities that Brexit will bring.Read more
The way people shop is constantly evolving, from the growth of online and the changing use of stores...Read more
The widespread disruption and closure of businesses caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent national and local lockdowns has brought into sharp focus the question of available insurance cover for losses under...Read more
The pandemic has had a deep and long-lasting effect on the leisure, food & drink sector, forcing operators to embrace new ways of attracting and servicing customers.Read more
There's a growing demand for retailers to do more to attract the Purple Pound – the collective spending power of disabled shoppers, estimated to be worth around £274bn. We look at the opportunities, the legal issues and...Read more
Green finance is gaining speed, driven by global climate change pressures and the recognition of the vital role which sustainability plays in a resilient financial services sector.Read more
Our complete service covers all aspects of regulatory law, from commercially-based compliance advice, right through to protecting the interests of companies or individuals facing regulatory investigation or prosecution.Read more
Our team has a broad range of experience including advisory, regulatory liaison and large-scale, complex multi-jurisdictional investigations.Read more
We regularly provide solutions on ‘business as usual’ fraud issues and have the expertise and resources needed to conduct large-scale investigations and recoveries for clients. Our team can support across the entire spectrum of services, from pre-emptive risk assessment through to investigation and recovery.Read more
Guidance on every aspect of regulatory change and all types of regulatory issues to clients ranging from retail banks to insurance and credit brokers, sub-prime lenders, credit providers and payment service providers.Read more