On 19 March 2020, the UK found itself in a national lockdown as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic and many business were forced to close their doors for a period of time and sustain significant financial losses as a consequence.
A large number of those businesses made claims for their losses under their Business Interruption (BI) insurance policies. However, many found that their policies were either inadequate or that their claims were being rejected. This led to widespread concerns about the lack of a positive response from some insurers and the basis on which they were refusing Covid-19 related claims.
The FCA sought to resolve this contractual uncertainty and brought, on behalf of policyholders, a test case against eight insurance companies including Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd; Argenta Syndicate Mangement Ltd; Ecclesiastical Insurance Office Plc; Hiscox Insurance Company Ltd; MS Amlin Underwriting Ltd; QBE UK Ltd; Royal & Sun Alliance Plc and Zurich Insurance Plc.
The High Court was asked to consider a representative sample of 21 BI policy wordings and to assess whether those BI policies covered losses resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. They were also asked to consider whether there was the necessary causal link between the losses suffered by the policyholders and the pandemic. The matter proceeded to an eight-day hearing towards the end of July 2020. Judgment was handed down on 15 September 2020.
The High Court ruled in favour of policyholders on the majority of the issues in September 2020 and made a number of declarations. The FCA and several of the insurers then appealed which was fast-tracked to the Supreme Court.
The appeal was heard in November 2020. The Supreme Court judgment was then handed down on 15 January 2021 and provides clarity on the matters in the test case.
The Supreme Court substantially allows the FCA’s appeal and dismisses those of the insurers.
The FCA has been actively encouraging insurers to take a ‘pragmatic, transparent and consistent’ approach with policyholders when discussing outstanding claims pending the outcome of the Court process.
It will take some time for the insurance industry and affected policyholders to digest the complex and lengthy judgment but it is clear that insurance pay-outs will be triggered under certain “no damage” clauses that cover disease and/or denial of access to business premises and that any such pay-outs should put a business or organisation in the position that they would have been had Covid-19 not occurred.
TLT appointed to Vodafone's global legal panelRead more
TLT appointed to sports and arts legal services panelRead more
Vexatious litigants - protecting respondents and the CourtRead more
TLT further expands UK-wide litigation teamRead more
The future of witness statements in the Business and Property CourtsRead more
Making a claim for Covid-19 business interruption lossesRead more
Will brokers face professional negligence surrounding business...Read more
Beyond BrexitRead more
Business interruption: Supreme Court finds in favour of policyholdersRead more
Advising on complex and reputationally sensitive matters involving litigation, arbitration, mediation and debt recovery.Read more
Our team provide practical, commercial solutions ranging from advice in the first stages of a disagreement through to court proceedings and enforcement.Read more
We are one of the UK's largest teams working in the field of financial services litigation. Our highly specialist lawyers have significant experience in acting and resolving a variety of disputes and claims that could impact an organisation's reputation.Read more