A significant Act of the Northern Ireland Executive – the Executive Committee (Functions) Act – was passed on 28 July and will now go forward for Royal Assent. Introduced to Stormont on 6 July it has been passed with considerable speed and could have important consequences for decisions on regionally significant planning applications. The Act also has broader significance to NI government decision making and has fuelled considerable debate over its wider political implications.
The consequences of the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal decision in Buick’s application as Chairperson of NOARC 21  NICA 26 continue to reverberate across NI government decision-making some 2 years after the judgment. The original challenge was over a decision to approve an energy from waste plant in North Belfast, at a time when the Stormont Executive was dissolved and no Minister was in place to make the final planning decision. However, the ruling of the Court of Appeal (upholding that of the High Court) – that the decision was unlawful – has had far reaching consequences.
The focus of the Court of Appeal’s judgment was that the decision to approve was "cross-cutting" in that it was of such regional significance and (political) controversy that other Ministerial departments and the Executive had to be involved in the final decision. It is this requirement for the Executive to be consulted that the 2020 Act now removes.
In the Buick judgment, the Court of Appeal considered that the decision ought to have been referred to the Executive Committee under section 20 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (“NIA 1998”) on two grounds. First, because the decision on the planning application involved the interests of the Department for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (“DAERA”) in the matter of environmental and waste policies and the Executive Office due to issues relating to compliance with EU Directives; and secondly, the matter more broadly was both significant and controversial.
The Bill amends s20 of the NIA 1998 in two key ways. Any non-planning decision made by a Minister of any Department is now only referable to the Executive where it is “significant or controversial” or “affects the exercise of the statutory responsibilities of one or more other Ministers more than incidentally”. Second, any decision of the Department of Infrastructure (“DFI”) or its Minister under the Planning Act (other than in formulating planning policy) is no longer referable to the Executive in any circumstances.
Undoubtedly the Act is a gateway to quicker planning decisions with the Executive Committee no longer a potential barrier to the DfI Minster making crucial and timely decisions on infrastructure projects. This is in many respects welcome given the backlog of regionally significant planning decisions that in part came out of the original Buick decision. The accelerated passage of the Act means we are likely to see long-awaited decisions in relation to regionally significant infrastructure applications forthcoming.
Following Buick, the High Court quashed the decision to proceed with the A5 road scheme upgrade and also overturned the approval of the North-South interconnector. A decision on the Casement Park stadium has also been delayed and other regionally significant projects remain in limbo. The impacts of Covid-19 on both the planning sector and economy as a whole may also be mitigated by these changes.
That said, the Act could lead to concerns (particularly by opponents to a project, whether commercial or private) over a perceived lack of scrutiny on controversial infrastructure projects and an increased risk of departments working in functional and political silos. Almost all regionally significant planning applications are controversial in some form and in many cases different political parties will have opposing views on their merits. Any DfI Minister would in effect have powers beyond those of their fellow Ministerial colleagues and be subject to less checks and balances.
Outside of the planning sphere, the change to the threshold for what decisions are “cross cutting” potentially has wide implications for governance in Northern Ireland. This may raise the bar to those issues which previously would have come before the Executive Committee, albeit that matters that are “significant and controversial” (except planning decisions) must still be referred. However, there remains scope for interpretation over the meaning of “significant and controversial” and “more than incidentally” – and where room for doubt exists the door remains open for legal challenge.
The Buick judgment has directly and indirectly impacted on many areas of NI governance, and for a decision on a single planning decision to have such wide-ranging effects is both remarkable and testament to the fundamental importance and implications of judicial oversight. It seems that the judgment will continue to influence decision-making and wider political discourse for some time to come.
You can read the legislation here.
Contributor: Sarah Mulholland
TLT’s Belfast-based Planning, Environment & Clean Energy team advises on all aspects of planning and environmental law in Northern Ireland and are qualified in Northern Ireland, England & Wales and the Republic of Ireland.
For more information, contact Andrew Ryan or Sarah Mulholland.
A fast-track for beautiful developments?Read more
Recent changes to planning: an overviewRead more
‘Build build build’: How will the Business and Planning Bill help...Read more
Amendments to permitted development rights for new homesRead more
Covid-19 - Measures to help developers with CIL paymentsRead more
How is the planning system in Northern Ireland dealing with COVID-19?Read more
Can you forfeit a mining lease under new COVID-19 measures?Read more
Community Infrastructure Levy: How to ensure that you can split...Read more
How will Northern Ireland's planning system progress with the 'New...Read more
As businesses adjust to new ways of working and plan for an uncertain future, we keep track of the emerging legal and regulatory issues.Read more
Keep on top of the employment law issues that matter most to you and your business with our new podcast.Read more
Keeping you up to date with the latest guidance on regulatory change and legal impact of the coronavirus pandemic.Read more
While future trading relationship with the EU is negotiated, we will be in a 'status quo' transition period until 31 December 2020. Follow our latest updates.Read more
Our Senior Managers Regime hot topic features news and insight to help banks, building societies, investment firms and UK branches of foreign banks prepare for the new regime.Read more
The clock is ticking for firms to prepare for moving from LIBOR to sterling risk-free rates. Follow our insights and events for strategic advice.Read more
We approach a brave new world of Gigabit full-fibre fixed communications, 5G mobile technologies, data driven markets enabled by true AI, with the potential for huge commercial and social growth and benefits. Follow our...Read more
Open Banking is driving innovation in banking and customer experience but also presents new challenges around security and data protection.Read more
As the UK moves towards a carbon neutral future, electric vehicles are the new watchword. We explore what this means for the energy market and investors through a series of legal insights.Read more