How to make sure remote working doesn’t discriminate against disabled employees
Businesses across the nation have seen a dramatic change in methods of working due to the impact of the coronavirus. To continue operating effectively, many companies have allowed the majority of their employees to work from home.
But remote working raises issues that now need to be considered more closely. This includes ensuring that this method of working does not discriminate against disabled employees.
A disability is one of nine protected characteristics under the Equality Act. A person is disabled if they:
(a) have a physical or mental impairment, and
(b) the impairment has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.
The Equality Act prohibits direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect disability discrimination, harassment relating to disability and victimisation.
A disabled employee may benefit from home working for a number of reasons, including a lack of commuting and being able to work in the comfort of their own home, which has likely been adapted to suit their needs. This can include adaptations such as a specific style of keyboard or voice activation software.
A cornerstone of the Equality Act is the duty to make a reasonable adjustment. Indeed, the government states that an employer has a duty to make reasonable adjustments in the workplace. This is to accommodate those with disabilities or physical or mental health conditions, and to ensure they are not substantially disadvantaged when doing their jobs.
Reasonable adjustments include:
In respect of the second point, anxiety has come to the forefront more recently and a person suffering from it can feel worry and nervousness about something that is intangible. Employers should be mindful of the ways in which they can effectively assist employees who suffer from anxiety and are working from home.
In terms of social anxiety disorders, where a provision, criterion or practice is applied to everyone but also puts certain individuals at a disadvantage, it is possible for a claim to be made for indirect discrimination if discrimination can be proven. On the flip side, this discrimination can occur even where the individual concerned is not required to comply with the provision, criterion or practice.
In Roberts v North West Ambulance Service, Mr Roberts suffered from a social anxiety disorder and his workplace had a practice of hot-desking. Due to his condition, he was exempted from this practice and provided with his own desk. However, he argued that he was put at a substantial disadvantage due to the fact that, on occasion, he found someone else sitting at his preferred desk when he arrived at work, causing him stress.
The first tribunal dismissed all the claims but it was remitted back to them for another review. The tribunal then found that Mr Roberts had indeed been disadvantaged, but that the employer had made reasonable adjustments in the circumstances. Mr Roberts disagreed and appealed. However the employment appeal tribunal rejected his appeal and upheld the decision. Nonetheless, employers need to be careful to ensure reasonable adjustments are made to accommodate anxious employees.
Employers should consult with their disabled employees candidly about their needs and do what they reasonably can to assist and ensure they are not put at a disadvantage through inaction.
Risks assessments should be undertaken, to ensure employees have a safe home working environment. Staggered hours is another method to ease the burden on disabled employees.
Finally, employees should be aware that disabled employees may not be able to use certain types of technology. For example, deaf employees would struggle with Zoom meetings – a sign language interpreter may be required as well as a completely different approach to meetings.
This article was first published by People Management.
This publication is intended for general guidance and represents our understanding of the relevant law and practice as at July 2020. Specific advice should be sought for specific cases. For more information see our terms & conditions.
Helping you navigate your business through the risks and opportunities that Brexit will bring.
Read moreThe way people shop is constantly evolving, from the growth of online and the changing use of stores...
Read moreThe widespread disruption and closure of businesses caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent national and local lockdowns has brought into sharp focus the question of available insurance cover for losses under...
Read moreWatch our video series for information on the legal issues that are affecting the real estate sector. Each...
Read moreThe pandemic has had a deep and long-lasting effect on the leisure, food & drink sector, forcing operators to embrace new ways of attracting and servicing customers.
Read moreThe pandemic has forced the majority of the workforce into a world of remote working. As a result, our cities are evolving.
Read moreOur countdown to Brexit and beyond podcast series looks at the impact for businesses on both sides of the pond of any free trade agreement between the UK and Europe and the UK and the US. This
Read moreThere's a growing demand for retailers to do more to attract the Purple Pound – the collective spending power of disabled shoppers, estimated to be worth around £274bn. We look at the opportunities, the legal issues and...
Read moreGreen finance is gaining speed, driven by global climate change pressures and the recognition of the vital role which sustainability plays in a resilient financial services sector.
Read moreKeep on top of the employment law issues that matter most to you and your business with our new podcast.
Read moreWe provide strategic and business as usual advice covering all aspects of employment law, as well as dealing with disputes, mediations, complex tribunal claims.
Read moreWe work alongside our clients to ensure compliance with the legal framework, sharing our experiences and combined knowledge to ensure they avoid the pitfalls.
Read more